Back to the Fantasy Football Articles Main Page
Fantasy Football Articles
![]()
Re: The
Selection of TE Tony Gonzalez in Round One of the FF Today Mock Draft
by Steve Stegeman (June 6, 2001)
Mock Drafter, FFToday.com
This
work was originally posted on the FF Today Message Board.
|
First, a preface, not an excuse - I
want to preface that: 1) In my 13 years
of fantasy football experience, I have only twice played in leagues that
required the fielding of a tight end; 2) I knew none of the tendencies of my
foes as this draft was my debut at the FFToday message boards; 3) I had no
and still have very little clue as to what "Value Based Draft," to
which everyone was proclaiming I was a strict adherent, is. At this point,
try to understand that I am trying to be candid and not arrogant. Using an analogy from "Good Will
Hunting," I just look at "the piano" and know how to play it. For
me, it is not a wooden box with white and black keys and foot pedals that
needs to be "figured" out, if you follow where I am going
here! I also want to add that I thought one
of the observations herein critiquing my selections after the fourth round
was particularly interesting as I actually thought that the strongest part of
my draft, for the most part, came after the fourth round with the exception
of my tenth round pick of Travis Prentice, but we will come back to this. Now, on to the meat... This is actually
going to be a mental "free-fall," so pardon my digressions and
circumlocutions. There are actually two reasons for my
taking Gonzalez, a strategic one and a statistical one, but there is really
no symetry between the two, i.e., they are arguments on different levels. ...There I was with the tenth pick of
the first round. The best running backs available, before, in my opinion, a
fall to the next tier, were, in order, Stephen Davis, Curtis Martin, Ahman
Green and, maybe, Ricky Williams. Remember, now, the Associated Press report
on Levens had not come out yet. If it had, I might have taken Davis. MIGHT
have! Or, I might have taken
Gonzalez, like I did, and then Williams. At any rate, there were four backs,
and there were four picks between 1.10 and 2.03. I really was hoping to land
Martin, to be honest, and I almost did. If Captain Lou went running back then
receiver, I would have. Now, I knew I wanted Gonzalez. Unfortunately, I also knew that the
1.10/2.03 hole was NOT the NATURAL area in which for him to be selected (If
there is anything to learn from this rationalization, I suppose that was it.).
I ALSO knew that he was most likely
not going to make it around to my 3.10 pick. Thus, I was somewhat a victim of
my circumstances. A trade was actually in order, but this was a mock draft,
and I was the new guy... Now, not knowing my competition, all I knew was that
if one of the two guys behind me valued Gonzalez the way I do, which is a
reasonable assumption on which to act, they had two picks before my next one
and probably would also be under the assumption that he would not make it
back around. So, I rolled the dice and lost to a degree. I ended up getting
the third of the four running backs listed above and Gonzalez. Now, after the fact, it appears, according
to Captain Lou, Meglamaniac and the "20-20 Hindsight Crew" that I
could have had Davis and (then) Gonzalez. But, it is not unreasonable to
think that I could have ended up with Davis and... Green or Williams, a
weaker version of what Captain Lou actually ended up with (Davis and Martin),
and no Tony G. Anyway, that was my thinking, strategically. All things
considered, I think it came out decently!
Now, statistically speaking, in my
league, the GBRFL, the guy who came in second place in our nine-team set-up,
which requires the fielding of 2 QB's, 3 RB's, 3 RC's, 1 PK and 1 DU/ST, no
TE's as such, used TE Tony Gonzalez as his #2 receiver all year long, and his
#1 was not stellar. It was Tim Brown, and for his #3, he platooned the likes
of Terry Glenn and Ike Hilliard. The only other tight ends who logged any
time on a GBRFL lineup were a few weeks by Shannon Sharpe and Ken Dilger and
one week by Kyle Brady. That was what was in my head, but let's look at what
I was thinking, or better yet the end result, in precise numeric terms. In my
opinion, Stephen Davis's high-end potential is 1,750 combined yards and 20
total touchdowns; his minimums, factoring in the possibility of a
non-season-ending injury and also the possibility of the loss of a few
carries given the presence of Donnell Bennett, who Schottenheimer loves, I
think are 1,250 and 10. Ahman Green's max is probably about 1,850 combined
yards and 15 total TD's while his minimums, barring major injury, are
probably 1,100 combined yards and 8 TD's. On to Tony Gonzalez, his max is
probably 1,350 and 13, and his minimums are about 1,000 and 8; whereas, the
closest guys to him, Shannon Sharpe and Freddie Jones, probably have shared
maximums at about 900 and 10 with minimums around 600 and 4. That was my
thinking, in a statistical light. In this case, the likelihood of Gonzalez
and Green being (significantly) better than, let's say, Davis and Sharpe or
Jones is quite good. Ultimately, though, I am not of the school that believes
that FF teams are made or broken in the first couple rounds. I believe that
strong teams are made by making strong selections in the mid to mid-late
rounds, i.e. the fifth through 11th/12th rounds, which brings me back to the
critical observations noted early. Germane Crowell was an absolute blessing
for my team. Heck, on a strand right here at FFToday, there was a running
debate regarding who was better, David Boston, Crowell or Darrell Jackson. To sum it up, it was basically established,
in a happenstance way that I would thoroughly agree with, that Boston and
Crowell are in a slightly different league than Jackson. In short, 1) Boston,
2) Crowell and a slightly distant 3) Jackson. Crowell was EXACTLY what I
needed at that time. I sured up my QB's, the last skill position I selected,
with sheer numbers taking three: Johnson, George and Weinke. Not too
shabby! Anderson, my insurance
policy at RB, though not flashy, is practically a lock for 800 to 950 yards
this season and came to me in the 11th round. In this league, it doesn't
matter how the numbers come. Unlike the GBRFL, it is not important that most
to all of the yardage gained by a RB come on the ground. Hatchette, the #1 guy on the Jets, who has
looked good in mini-camp, and Wayne, who will probably be the #2 in the hot
Indy offense, are pretty good picks in the ninth and 12th rounds,
respectively. Then, Tampa in the seventh!
On the negative side: Prentice, I felt like I couldn't pass up in the
tenth, but, make no mistakes, I don't really like him. However, I think that
was my only BAD pick after the fourth round. Anyway, as far as this goes, we'll see how this "Crystal
Ball League" thing pans out. Who knows??I sure don't, other than to say
that I strongly believe that my team will be ONE of the ONES in contention. |
Top of Page
Copyright ?1999 by GBRFL. All rights reserved.
Revised: 08 Oct 2014 11:56:22 -0700