Author |
Topic: Do we have "expanded" rosters off-season? (Read 654 times) |
|
Red Zone Master
    
# 179

oh Lord, deliver us from the fury of the Norsemen!

Posts: 1045
Back to top
|
 |
Re: Do we have "expanded" rosters off-season?
« Reply #5 on: Jul 19th, 2006, 2:56pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 19th, 2006, 1:10pm, MordecaiCourage wrote:| Actually, after thinking about this for only a few seconds after my previous post...it could be summized that I unfairly have 2 extra bargaining chips in any future trade scenarios. It seems that maybe if you make a trade like I did and your roster busts the 21 man point, you should have to drop the excess players at the same time you make the trade. That seems sensible to me. |
| This is the angle I was coming from. But it really doesn't matter too much, I was just a bit curious.
|
|
Logged |
3 straight underperforming seasons, one nitwit head coach, 2 problem child WRs, 1 collosal trade bungle....but a wild boat party with booze and hookers!!!????? Priceless.
|
|
|
Gridiron Great
GBRFLer Champ - '14, '23
    
# 5

Posts: 3340
Back to top
|
 |
Re: Do we have "expanded" rosters off-season?
« Reply #6 on: Jul 19th, 2006, 3:12pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 19th, 2006, 1:36pm, Philly wrote:| Actually, I think you only have to be at the correct roster size when you submit your week one lineup, meaning that you don't have to drop any players now. Of course when you submit your keeper list, it will be the appropriate size and then you won't have to worry about having extra players. |
| You are correct in saying that you have until the time the keeper lists are due. One team can have 30 players, it does not matter because when the keeper lists are submitted, everyone has to be at the correct roster size.
|
|
Logged |
"Every rule has an exception....the exception can't become the rule"
|
|
|
UFF Primetime Prophet
    
# 29
 Pay, I said pay attention, son.

Posts: 5675
Back to top
|
 |
Re: Do we have "expanded" rosters off-season?
« Reply #7 on: Jul 19th, 2006, 3:17pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 19th, 2006, 1:10pm, MordecaiCourage wrote:| Actually, after thinking about this for only a few seconds after my previous post...it could be summized that I unfairly have 2 extra bargaining chips in any future trade scenarios. It seems that maybe if you make a trade like I did and your roster busts the 21 man point, you should have to drop the excess players at the same time you make the trade. That seems sensible to me. |
| You don't have an unfair advantage. While you might have an advantage with 2 extra bargaining chips, everyone else has the opportunity to expand their rosters through trade as well, so there's nothing unfair about it.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|