Author |
Topic: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) (Read 367 times) |
|
UFF Primetime Prophet
    
# 29
 Pay, I said pay attention, son.

Posts: 5675
Back to top
|
 |
Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...)
« Reply #5 on: Nov 1st, 2002, 8:40pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Nov 1st, 2002, 5:11pm, Razzak wrote:| He'll be Dominic Rhodes for a week, but Edge doesn't have a busted ACL this time so RW2 is only valuable for a week. |
| Priest Holmes and Clinton Portis only have byes this week, so that's all I need RW2 for. Hopefully he'll have a huge week and I can use him as trade bait. My receivers need a bit of an upgrade.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
GM
    
# 1
 Go 9ers

Posts: 351
Back to top
|
 |
Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...)
« Reply #8 on: Nov 3rd, 2002, 5:09am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Nov 2nd, 2002, 10:41pm, Philly wrote:| Hey Razzak... any news on the Niners RBs? I've got Barlow and wondering if he'll get a majority of the carries this weekend, or is Hearst healthy enough? If Barlow is splitting carries, I may need to try Antowain Smith against Buff... |
| Hope you get this in time. Hearst is getting the start, but I think Barlow will get the touchdowns again this week. When deciding between two tough choices, I usually go with the RB who's more likely to go for a huge game. In this case, Barlow's much more likely to have 150 yards than Smith is. Actually I think that Pats-Buffalo game will be relatively low scoring . Eh, let me sum it up again. Hearst = starting but gimpy. Barlow = at least 50 total yards, possibly 120/2tds.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
GM
    
# 1
 Go 9ers

Posts: 351
Back to top
|
 |
Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...)
« Reply #12 on: Nov 3rd, 2002, 11:26pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Nov 3rd, 2002, 5:09am, Razzak wrote: Hope you get this in time. Hearst is getting the start, but I think Barlow will get the touchdowns again this week. When deciding between two tough choices, I usually go with the RB who's more likely to go for a huge game. In this case, Barlow's much more likely to have 150 yards than Smith is. Actually I think that Pats-Buffalo game will be relatively low scoring . Eh, let me sum it up again. Hearst = starting but gimpy. Barlow = at least 50 total yards, possibly 120/2tds. |
| Okay, Barlow did get 60 yards but good lord did Smith go off this week. Sorry if that cost you I guess I was half right, buffalo didn't score much at least
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|