Author |
Topic: Perplexing Wideout Dilemma (Read 334 times) |
|
UFF Primetime Prophet
# 29
Pay, I said pay attention, son.
  
Posts: 5675
Back to top
|
 |
Perplexing Wideout Dilemma
« on: Nov 16th, 2002, 12:53pm » |
 Quote  Modify
|
I'm in a standard performance league (1 per 10 yards, 6 per TD). I have four wideouts and need to start two. I have a pretty good idea which two I will start, but I want to see if anyone has other ideas.
Donald Driver, GB @ MIN
Ed McCaffrey, DEN @ SEA
Randy Moss, MIN vs. GB
Tai Streets, SF @ SD
|
|
 Logged |
|
|
|
Fantasy Field General
# 10
Posts: 838
Back to top
|
 |
Re: Perplexing Wideout Dilemma
« Reply #5 on: Nov 16th, 2002, 3:41pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Even a mediocre McNabb is equal to what Griese has done on a routine basis. Nice prolem to have, but Mcnabb is #1 in a basic scoring system.
Along those lines, I'm in four leagues with 3 vastly different scoring systems. 2 are basic performance 1 per 10, 1 for 20/25 passing. 1 is in it's final year as a touchdown only, moving to a stingy performance 1per 25 rush/rec 1 per 75 pass. Last and least, a very wacked performance/distance scoring that in very few cases, is very reflective of performance/value of an individual performance. {note: I didn't seem near as down on that scoring when I won it all for the first time after 8-9 years  } It's fair in that we all play by the same rules, but after a few seasons of exposure to a more balanced performance system, I like the distance scoring less and less.
An example, here are the scoring rules for the main positions
TD Distance: Rushing
From To Value
0 3 25
4 10 50
11 25 75
26 40 100
41 60 125
61 100 150
TD Distance: Passing & Recieving
From To Value
0 15 25
16 30 50
31 45 75
46 60 100
61 80 125
81 100 150
So a reciever with a 62yd bomb and not much else is "2-3x better" than a rb who gets who gets 2 td runs from inside the five? More exciting yes, 125 to 50, no. Rant over!
|
| « Last Edit: Nov 16th, 2002, 3:43pm by FourTwoOh » |
Logged |
|
|
|
GM
# 52
I love ''the Gridiron''!
Posts: 376
Back to top
|
|
Re: Perplexing Wideout Dilemma
« Reply #8 on: Nov 16th, 2002, 7:53pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Nov 16th, 2002, 3:41pm, FourTwoOh wrote:Even a mediocre McNabb is equal to what Griese has done on a routine basis. Nice prolem to have, but Mcnabb is #1 in a basic scoring system.
Along those lines, I'm in four leagues with 3 vastly different scoring systems. 2 are basic performance 1 per 10, 1 for 20/25 passing. 1 is in it's final year as a touchdown only, moving to a stingy performance 1per 25 rush/rec 1 per 75 pass. Last and least, a very wacked performance/distance scoring that in very few cases, is very reflective of performance/value of an individual performance. {note: I didn't seem near as down on that scoring when I won it all for the first time after 8-9 years } It's fair in that we all play by the same rules, but after a few seasons of exposure to a more balanced performance system, I like the distance scoring less and less.
An example, here are the scoring rules for the main positions
TD Distance: Rushing
From To Value
0 3 25
4 10 50
11 25 75
26 40 100
41 60 125
61 100 150
TD Distance: Passing & Recieving
From To Value
0 15 25
16 30 50
31 45 75
46 60 100
61 80 125
81 100 150
So a reciever with a 62yd bomb and not much else is "2-3x better" than a rb who gets who gets 2 td runs from inside the five? More exciting yes, 125 to 50, no. Rant over! |
|
Heard that. The only reason I sometimes debate Griese vs. McNabb is qb.s in this league get 10 bonus points for 250 + yards passing. Not a huge factor but you have to consider all the angles in this business.
|
|
Logged |
I was framed, I never do nothin wrong but every time I get the blame, I was framed!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Home
Help
Search
Members
Games
Login
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print
Remove