Author |
Topic: JJones start over a WR? (Read 413 times) |
|
UFF Primetime Prophet
    
# 29
 Pay, I said pay attention, son.

Posts: 5675
Back to top
|
 |
Re: JJones start over a WR?
« Reply #7 on: Sep 9th, 2004, 9:58am » |
Quote Modify
|
If it was me, I'd start JJones, but I guess I'm biased towards RBs. However, Price is an interesting option with 1 pt/reception facing a weakened San Fran defense. Don't even think about Glenn or Taylor. Stallworth has had a quiet (but injury-free) pre-season, although he faces an improved Seattle secondary. Seattle, however, should score a ton of points, so NO will be playing catch-up.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Red Zone Master
GBRFL2er CBFL Champ - '03
    
# 18
 He ain't on the all-time list because he's pretty.
Posts: 1296
Back to top
|
 |
Re: JJones start over a WR?
« Reply #11 on: Sep 9th, 2004, 1:11pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 9th, 2004, 12:33pm, StegRock wrote:| DUDE, YOU GOTTA START PEERLESS PRICE, PERIOD (or three exclamation points)!!! #1 receiver on a decent offensive team over a #2 running back on a bad offensive team any day of the week, brother. |
| I guess I agree with this, except how it relates to the parties involved. I think Jones is Dallas's #1 running back, when healthy. I also see Atlanta and Dallas being a lot closer on offense (Atlanta as above-average, Dallas as below-average). Despite the nit-picking, this week I'd agree with the ultimate sentiment, go with Price.
|
|
Logged |
11/20/04 - Buckeyes salvage season by stomping that team from up north. (Posted 11/14/04)
|
|
|
UFF Primetime Prophet
    
# 29
 Pay, I said pay attention, son.

Posts: 5675
Back to top
|
 |
Re: JJones start over a WR?
« Reply #12 on: Sep 10th, 2004, 2:59pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 9th, 2004, 9:58am, Philly wrote:If it was me, I'd start JJones, but I guess I'm biased towards RBs. However, Price is an interesting option with 1 pt/reception facing a weakened San Fran defense. Don't even think about Glenn or Taylor. Stallworth has had a quiet (but injury-free) pre-season, although he faces an improved Seattle secondary. Seattle, however, should score a ton of points, so NO will be playing catch-up. |
| http://www.dallascowboys.com/news.cfm?id=E55ABFC9-C02A-1A10-5A24D29EF3C1 3458 Parcells won't commit to playing Jones at all in the game, even though Jones says he is sore but ready to go... better go with Price or Stallworth (I'd go Price).
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|