|
||
|
Title: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Philly on Oct 31st, 2002, 12:36pm Any chance he is the new Dominic Rhodes? I picked him up this week just in case. Anyone have any info on Edge's prognosis for this weekend? Is he worth a start over Kevan Barlow or Antowain Smith? (Both my starting RBs - Holmes and Portis - have byes this weekend.) [smiley=ohshit.gif] I'm undefeated in my performance league this year, but have to face the #2 team this weekend. [smiley=ohshit.gif] |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Brian Griese,s Dog on Oct 31st, 2002, 1:02pm Based on my experience with Edge last year I think RW2 likely will be the next coming of Rhodes. From what little I saw of the Indy game the offense looked much stronger with Rw in the game. Last official word I saw Edge is Doubtful. Of course he was quest.doubt or prob for 4-5 weeks last year before he went on IR. An early wether report predicted a lake effect snow storm in Buff. so it will likely be a running game. I guess I would make RW vs. Smith a Game Day Decision. [smiley=dog.gif] |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Philly on Oct 31st, 2002, 1:15pm on 10/31/02 at 13:02:23, Brian Griese,s Dog wrote:
Lotsa good info there! Thanks. I'll keep an eye on things. |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by ugley on Oct 31st, 2002, 3:10pm I rarely agree with the flea bag, but he does make some good points. In paticular the game day decsion since the Hearst situation is not clear cut. [smiley=dancin.gif] |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Razzak on Nov 1st, 2002, 5:11pm He'll be Dominic Rhodes for a week, but Edge doesn't have a busted ACL this time so RW2 is only valuable for a week. |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Philly on Nov 1st, 2002, 8:40pm on 11/01/02 at 17:11:16, Razzak wrote:
Priest Holmes and Clinton Portis only have byes this week, so that's all I need RW2 for. Hopefully he'll have a huge week and I can use him as trade bait. My receivers need a bit of an upgrade. [smiley=thumbsup.gif] |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Razzak on Nov 2nd, 2002, 10:00pm on 11/01/02 at 20:40:01, Philly wrote:
Ditto on the Priest bye week here. Hopin RW2 does well. |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Philly on Nov 2nd, 2002, 10:41pm Hey Razzak... any news on the Niners RBs? I've got Barlow and wondering if he'll get a majority of the carries this weekend, or is Hearst healthy enough? If Barlow is splitting carries, I may need to try Antowain Smith against Buff... |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Razzak on Nov 3rd, 2002, 5:09am on 11/02/02 at 22:41:46, Philly wrote:
Hope you get this in time. Hearst is getting the start, but I think Barlow will get the touchdowns again this week. When deciding between two tough choices, I usually go with the RB who's more likely to go for a huge game. In this case, Barlow's much more likely to have 150 yards than Smith is. Actually I think that Pats-Buffalo game will be relatively low scoring [smiley=ohshit.gif]. Eh, let me sum it up again. Hearst = starting but gimpy. Barlow = at least 50 total yards, possibly 120/2tds. |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Philly on Nov 3rd, 2002, 10:43am Thanks man! [smiley=zenmaster.gif] |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Drugrunner on Nov 3rd, 2002, 12:38pm 11:56 am est - For the Colts, RB Ricky Williams pulled his hamstring in pre-game warmups and is inactive. FB Jim Finn starts. #3 RB James Mungro will back up Finn. Starting RB Edgerrin James (hamstring) is also inactive GET RW2 OUT OF YOUR LINE UP |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Philly on Nov 3rd, 2002, 3:01pm See my response in your thread Drugrunner. Thanks for trying to help, but I couldn't do a thing about it. |
||
|
Title: Re: Ricky Williams (no, the other one...) Post by Razzak on Nov 3rd, 2002, 11:26pm on 11/03/02 at 05:09:23, Razzak wrote:
Okay, Barlow did get 60 yards but good lord did Smith go off this week. Sorry if that cost you :( I guess I was half right, buffalo didn't score much at least :( |
||
|
Fantasyfootballer.com's Gridiron » Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.1! YaBB © 2000-2002, Xnull. All Rights Reserved. |