Fantasyfootballer.com's Gridiron


    
      
        Fantasyfootballer.com's Gridiron
        (https://www.fantasyfootballer.com/cgi-bin/theGridiron/YaBB.cgi)
      

        the Gridiron >> the Red Zone >>  Since we're on the subject of WRs...
        
(Message started by: paulinstl on Nov 9^th, 2002, 6:28pm)

Title: Since we're on the subject of WRs...
Post by paulinstl on Nov 9^th, 2002, 6:28pm

I will be playing:

Gannon
Ahman Green
Deuce McCallister
Gonzo
Troy Brown...

I need another WR. My choices are:

Pathon
Frank Sanders
Coles
Chambers

What do you guys think? I hate having a RB and WR from the same team in my lineup, so I'm inclined to not go with Pathon.

[smiley=frustrated.gif]

Title: Re: Since we're on the subject of WRs...
Post by paulinstl on Nov 9^th, 2002, 6:30pm

So does one more post change my status level? [smiley=alcoholic.gif]

Title: Re: Since we're on the subject of WRs...
Post by paulinstl on Nov 9^th, 2002, 6:31pm

YEP! I AM NOW AN ASISSTANT [smiley=coach.gif]

Title: Re: Since we're on the subject of WRs...
Post by FourTwoOh on Nov 9^th, 2002, 6:35pm

A case can be made for or against Sanders. A legit #1 if by default only. I tend to value that maybe too much in a situation like this, but man, there has only been 4 tds to wr all year and he had two of those were his already so step right up mr sanders a grab you share. :shudder:

Chambers I'm down on because of qb. Not comin off my bech this week.

By default that leaves Coles. Your hottest hand as he's consistently getting steady points week after week. Probably the toughest d faced but Miami's not kickin' anybody's ass either. Coles for President! ;D

Title: Re: Since we're on the subject of WRs...
Post by ColaSteeler on Nov 9^th, 2002, 6:37pm

While I agree that Sanders could get a Td pass since he's the #1 by default, I like Coles a lot better. Since Pennington took over, he has gotten some nice yards and several TDs. I'd pick him.

Title: Re: Since we're on the subject of WRs...
Post by FourTwoOh on Nov 9^th, 2002, 6:44pm

on 11/09/02 at 18:37:59, ColaSteeler wrote:

While I agree that Sanders could get a Td pass since he's the #1 by default, I like Coles a lot better. Since Pennington took over, he has gotten some nice yards and several TDs. I'd pick him.

agreed. {damn accidental posting before finishing}

Title: Re: Since we're on the subject of WRs...
Post by Barnaby_Wilde on Nov 9^th, 2002, 6:46pm

Coles, Sanders, Chambers, Pathon in that order. I agree with Cola. Coles has been getting more looks now that Pennington is the starter.

Title: Re: Since we're on the subject of WRs...
Post by ugley on Nov 9^th, 2002, 6:54pm

Coles, If you get points for distance td.s all the better. [smiley=wave.gif]

Title: Re: Since we're on the subject of WRs...
Post by ugley on Nov 9^th, 2002, 6:56pm

on 11/09/02 at 18:31:25, paulinstl wrote:

YEP! I AM NOW AN ASISSTANT [smiley=coach.gif]

[smiley=bonghit.gif] [smiley=cheers.gif] [smiley=wave.gif]

Title: Re: Since we're on the subject of WRs...
Post by Drugrunner on Nov 9^th, 2002, 8:01pm

All options suck. That said, I would go with Frank Sanders against Seattle.

When they played in week 2 Sanders did score, although he only had that single catch. The last two weeks, he has had 6 catches each, and he has been coming on. With Boston out, Sanders is the best option there now.

The only risk is that since a 1 legged grandmother could get 100 yards rushing against the Seahawks, they might not need to pass at all.

Coles is your second best option, but go with Sanders.

Title: Re: Since we're on the subject of WRs...
Post by StegRock on Nov 10^th, 2002, 9:39am

on 11/09/02 at 20:01:01, Drugrunner wrote:

MAN, could not have stated it any better! It is not a move for the faint of heart, but I, too, would go with Sanders in this sitch. He is now a #1... again. Remember, Plummer doubters, Plummer had his BIG fuckin' games back in the day when Boston was not even in the game. Sanders was!