Fantasyfootballer.com's Gridiron (https://www.fantasyfootballer.com/cgi-bin/theGridiron/YaBB.cgi)
the Gridiron >> the Red Zone >> Another WR question
(Message started by: CoachH on Oct 10th, 2003, 1:06pm)

Title: Another WR question
Post by CoachH on Oct 10th, 2003, 1:06pm
Who to start?

Moulds probably won't play so I actually have to think this week. :-/  

Bruce v. ATL or
Chambers v. JAC

Help me pick one, please.

Title: Re: Another WR question
Post by captainpurple on Oct 10th, 2003, 1:31pm
If you have those 2 options besides Moulds, you're doing pretty good!  

Go with Chambers.  He's the main man in MIA, while Bruce has to split with Holt/Looker/Gordon/etc.


Title: Re: Another WR question
Post by DOLFAN on Oct 10th, 2003, 2:34pm
JAX and ATL DEFs suck big time.
I would go with Bruce here though. RWms will get pound the ball have 30 carries and get 2 TDS. Chambers should aheva  good day too, but think Bruce will have a better day.
Chambers is the only WR in MIA and teams know this, so they will double him. Looks at last weeks stats. Holt will get doubled so Bruce will get more reads.
That or toss a coin. Just my $.02

Title: Re: Another WR question
Post by BarnabyWilde on Oct 10th, 2003, 5:36pm
Whichever one you choose, chances are the other will put of better numbers!!  ;)

Kidding aside, I think I'd go with Bruce too, becauase RW will run the ball well vs. the Jags

Title: Re: Another WR question
Post by StegRock on Oct 10th, 2003, 6:16pm
I would lean toward Chambers.  I like Atlanta's DB's a little more than Jacksonville's and Chambers is more due, especially after last week's weak numbers.

Title: Re: Another WR question
Post by Noey21 on Oct 12th, 2003, 12:29pm
Go with Bruce on MNF.  I am a firm beleiver in letting everyone swat and starting MNF players.  Plus I feel that the Rams want to show they are still threatening on offense look for lots of passes and running up their score.
[smiley=boxer.gif]



Fantasyfootballer.com's Gridiron » Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.1!
YaBB © 2000-2002,
Xnull. All Rights Reserved.