Author |
Topic: Trash Talk Thread (Read 65613 times) |
|
Philosopher King
of Fantasy Football
Site Administrator
GBRFLer
Champ - '94, '99, '02, '04
I love ''the Gridiron''!
  
Posts: 19657
Back to top
|
 |
Re: Trash Talk Thread
« Reply #254 on: Oct 12th, 2010, 9:57am » |
 Quote  Modify
|
Let me make sure you get some of this too, Travis, boddy...
Travis
|
|
ME
Or, maybe, for you it's some sweet chin music...
ME
|
|
Travis
That is, balls on your chin!
|
|
 Logged |
|
|
|
Fantasy Field General
GBRFLer
Champ - '97, '00, '01, '11
# 12
No Vaseline for you!
Posts: 602
Back to top
|
 |
Re: Trash Talk Thread
« Reply #255 on: Oct 17th, 2010, 9:31pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Joe, for all the shit talking you do, you do suck. It was nice kicking your ass on a week in which my team sucked. I mean really, how bad is your team? So nice that you are in the basement, i guess your season projections are going to shit like your team. It is great everyday we all dont need to hear your predictions and jaw yacking about your team and great analysis of players. You suck, your team sucks and go fuck yourself!!!
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Fantasy Field General
GBRFLer
Champ - '95, '98, '08, '09, '10, '13, '15, '17, '19
# 22
9X Ultimate Supreme Champion
Posts: 805
Back to top
|
|
Re: Trash Talk Thread
« Reply #256 on: Oct 27th, 2010, 4:56pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Having Kenny Britt's 200+ yards and 3 TD on my bench really sucks, especially when this was a last-minute switch out of my line-up.
I would have really liked to have beaten the last place team by a few more points after that owner's week 1 trash talk and predictions of a "change of power" (See September 16th post). I can only take satisfaction in the fact that having Britt on my bench may have hurt that team's chances when they are once again in the draft lottery.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Fantasy Field General
GBRFLer
Champ - '06
# 414
Semper Philosophans
Posts: 611
Back to top
|
|
Re: Trash Talk Thread
« Reply #262 on: Nov 1st, 2010, 12:33pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 31st, 2010, 7:49pm, Flesh is Fantasy wrote:| Anyone care to chime in on Joe's assessment of Vernon Davis: "he would be a #2 receiver on any team in this league, with the possible exception of Bohrer." |
|
Yeah, I'll chime in: I don't know what Joe's smoking. Where to start . . . Let me just run through some of the teams in our league:
#1: COOPER - Bohrer's receivers move to the kiddie pool when my receivers show up to the party. Vernon Davis would never sniff the starting lineup on my roster. In fact, he wouldn't even be my bye-week fill-in -- Andre Johnson, Anquan Boldin, Antonio Gates, and Mike Williams are all ahead of him. So he'd be the #5 receiver on my roster.
#2: PAK - Vernon Davis wouldn't even make the starting lineup on Rob Pak's team: he'd have to be inserted ahead of Reggie Wayne and Calvin Johnson and DeSean Jackson. That ain't happening (except in case of injury, obviously).
#3: FEDER- The same might be true for Danny Feder. Is Vernon Davis better than either Hakeem Nicks or Miles Austin? No. Is he better than the #3 receiver on Danny's team -- Dallas Clark? Maybe (at this point, yes, if only because Clark is done for the year; but when healthy, I'd take Clark). So Davis would NOT be Danny's #2 receiver; he MIGHT be Danny's #3 receiver (maybe), at best.
#4: BOHRER -- I think Bohrer actually has the 3rd or 4th best receiving corps in the league -- not the first, as Joe implied. And Joe has already admitted that Vernon Davis would probably not be Bohrer's second-best receiver, so 'nuff said.
#5: HAHN - I don't think Mark Hahn would insert Vernon Davis into his lineup as his #2 receiver. Is Vernon Davis better than 4 of the following 5 receivers on Hahn's roster: Brandon Marshall, Chad Ochocinco, Dez Bryant, Braylon Edwards, and Marques Colston? Highly debatable -- highly.
#6: TROUT - If I were Dave Trout, I wouldn't consider Vernon Davis my #2 receiver. He's got Austin Collie and Mike Sims-Walker and Santonio Holmes. Perhaps Davis is a #3 on that team.
#7: WARNER - Steve Warner would probably not covet Vernon Davis as his #2 receiver. Wes Welker, Jeremy Maclin, and Greg Jennings are his starters -- maybe once in awhile Warner would insert Davis instead of Welker.
#8: STEGEMAN - Steg probably wouldn't consider Vernon Davis worthy of his #2 receiver spot on his team. You can't put him ahead of Terrell Owens right now; can you put him ahead of all of the above: Dwayne Bowe, Steve Smith (Giants), Mike Williams (Seattle), and Hines Ward? Tough sell, that.
#9: PARSONS - Joe's 6 receivers (which are taken from 3 teams: Chargers [2], Vikings [3], and Niners [Vernon Davis] - that can't end well, can it?) are such that I don't think Vernon Davis is 2nd best. Is he better than both Vincent Jackson and Percy Harvin? Is he better than Sidney Rice? And this is to say nothing of Randy Moss. Yikes! I don't think Davis is even third best. Funny, though: if you're Joe, although you may think that Harvin and Rice and Jackson are all of them better than Davis, still, do you really want to start all those guys ahead of him if that means your lineup at receiver consists of only 2 teams? So don't you kinda have to start Davis as your #3, with some combination of Harvin and Jackson and Rice (when they come back) as your #1 and #2? Weird. Still, though, how can Joe think Davis is a #2 receiver ON HIS OWN TEAM! (Except for the first 8 weeks, when V-Jax and Rice aren't playing.)
So, in conclusion, I don't think Vernon Davis is good enough to be the #2 receiver for 9 of the 10 teams in this league. In fact, he wouldn't even be a starter for at least 4 teams in our league.
|
| « Last Edit: Nov 1st, 2010, 12:37pm by Travistotle » |
Logged |
|
|
|
Fantasy Field General
GBRFLer
Champ - '95, '98, '08, '09, '10, '13, '15, '17, '19
# 22
9X Ultimate Supreme Champion
Posts: 805
Back to top
|
|
Re: Trash Talk Thread
« Reply #264 on: Nov 5th, 2010, 12:05pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Hat's off to Pak whose line-up was initially laughable prior to last week's game because of byes and injuries. But he stepped it up for the first time and made a move to win and it worked. I don't mind a little competition. 
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Philosopher King
of Fantasy Football
Site Administrator
GBRFLer
Champ - '94, '99, '02, '04
I love ''the Gridiron''!
Posts: 19657
Back to top
|
 |
Re: Trash Talk Thread
« Reply #269 on: Nov 15th, 2010, 10:17pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Thanks, Steve.  But, I don't know about your getting your ass kicked. Vick's second rushing touchdown was a dagger. You were, with Armstrong and Maclin, though, still alive up until that point, but that rushing touchdown was a killer.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Philosopher King
of Fantasy Football
Site Administrator
GBRFLer
Champ - '94, '99, '02, '04
I love ''the Gridiron''!
Posts: 19657
Back to top
|
|
Re: Trash Talk Thread
« Reply #270 on: Nov 15th, 2010, 11:25pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Nov 1st, 2010, 12:33pm, T-Rave wrote:Yeah, I'll chime in: I don't know what Joe's smoking. Where to start . . . Let me just run through some of the teams in our league:
#1: COOPER - Bohrer's receivers move to the kiddie pool when my receivers show up to the party. Vernon Davis would never sniff the starting lineup on my roster. In fact, he wouldn't even be my bye-week fill-in -- Andre Johnson, Anquan Boldin, Antonio Gates, and Mike Williams are all ahead of him. So he'd be the #5 receiver on my roster.
#2: PAK - Vernon Davis wouldn't even make the starting lineup on Rob Pak's team: he'd have to be inserted ahead of Reggie Wayne and Calvin Johnson and DeSean Jackson. That ain't happening (except in case of injury, obviously).
#3: FEDER- The same might be true for Danny Feder. Is Vernon Davis better than either Hakeem Nicks or Miles Austin? No. Is he better than the #3 receiver on Danny's team -- Dallas Clark? Maybe (at this point, yes, if only because Clark is done for the year; but when healthy, I'd take Clark). So Davis would NOT be Danny's #2 receiver; he MIGHT be Danny's #3 receiver (maybe), at best.
#4: BOHRER -- I think Bohrer actually has the 3rd or 4th best receiving corps in the league -- not the first, as Joe implied. And Joe has already admitted that Vernon Davis would probably not be Bohrer's second-best receiver, so 'nuff said.
#5: HAHN - I don't think Mark Hahn would insert Vernon Davis into his lineup as his #2 receiver. Is Vernon Davis better than 4 of the following 5 receivers on Hahn's roster: Brandon Marshall, Chad Ochocinco, Dez Bryant, Braylon Edwards, and Marques Colston? Highly debatable -- highly.
#6: TROUT - If I were Dave Trout, I wouldn't consider Vernon Davis my #2 receiver. He's got Austin Collie and Mike Sims-Walker and Santonio Holmes. Perhaps Davis is a #3 on that team.
#7: WARNER - Steve Warner would probably not covet Vernon Davis as his #2 receiver. Wes Welker, Jeremy Maclin, and Greg Jennings are his starters -- maybe once in awhile Warner would insert Davis instead of Welker.
#8: STEGEMAN - Steg probably wouldn't consider Vernon Davis worthy of his #2 receiver spot on his team. You can't put him ahead of Terrell Owens right now; can you put him ahead of all of the above: Dwayne Bowe, Steve Smith (Giants), Mike Williams (Seattle), and Hines Ward? Tough sell, that.
#9: PARSONS - Joe's 6 receivers (which are taken from 3 teams: Chargers [2], Vikings [3], and Niners [Vernon Davis] - that can't end well, can it?) are such that I don't think Vernon Davis is 2nd best. Is he better than both Vincent Jackson and Percy Harvin? Is he better than Sidney Rice? And this is to say nothing of Randy Moss. Yikes! I don't think Davis is even third best. Funny, though: if you're Joe, although you may think that Harvin and Rice and Jackson are all of them better than Davis, still, do you really want to start all those guys ahead of him if that means your lineup at receiver consists of only 2 teams? So don't you kinda have to start Davis as your #3, with some combination of Harvin and Jackson and Rice (when they come back) as your #1 and #2? Weird. Still, though, how can Joe think Davis is a #2 receiver ON HIS OWN TEAM! (Except for the first 8 weeks, when V-Jax and Rice aren't playing.)
So, in conclusion, I don't think Vernon Davis is good enough to be the #2 receiver for 9 of the 10 teams in this league. In fact, he wouldn't even be a starter for at least 4 teams in our league. |
|
I don't know how this got by the goalie... I just noticed this tonight. GREAT stuff, Ravenous!  And, to think, you didn't even include the #1 receiver in the NFL, Brandon Lloyd. Yea, Vernon Davis is the commodity we're all fighting over,... like Robert Meachem.  Joe's brain is like a stupid bowl of oatmeal stirred with a crusty dirty douche...
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Fantasy Field General
GBRFLer
Champ - '97, '00, '01, '11
# 12
No Vaseline for you!
Posts: 602
Back to top
|
|
Re: Trash Talk Thread
« Reply #272 on: Nov 30th, 2010, 11:42pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Ohhhh yeah!! It was the brilliance of trading for the browns that did it, not to mention luck. Fred Jackson rc for 105yds and td, and miles Austin 60yd rush for td. Rob, your next!! My match ups have sucked but luck for sure has been on my side, I need hakkem the dream back as well. It is just fun to be in it and not ten games out like i have been used to in the past. Joe, you suck, your team sucks, you should learn from the best like me on how to turn things around. It is good you have all these draft picks, I'll be happy to consult you for a 2023 week five free agent pick!
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Fantasy Field General
GBRFLer
Champ - '95, '98, '08, '09, '10, '13, '15, '17, '19
# 22
9X Ultimate Supreme Champion
Posts: 805
Back to top
|
|
Re: Trash Talk Thread
« Reply #273 on: Dec 3rd, 2010, 8:14pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Feder, good to see you back in the mix. Plus you are well on your way to beating Pak this week ... despite not playing Schaub ... jackass. I wish Steg had done the same with Vick as I am well on my way to losing this week.
The league is still Pak's to lose, especially if Peterson is limited.
What happens if there is a three way tie? Does it goto head-to-head or points differential?
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Home
Help
Search
Members
Games
Login
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print
OUCH! 
