Author |
Topic: plan (a) vs. plan (b)... (Read 239 times) |
|
Red Zone Master
    
# 179

oh Lord, deliver us from the fury of the Norsemen!

Posts: 1045
Back to top
|
 |
Re: plan (a) vs. plan (b)...
« Reply #3 on: Jul 21st, 2004, 10:41am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jul 20th, 2004, 8:52pm, prm wrote:| ...contrary to popular belief, i believe a top qb is worth the money (i've won 4/6 superbowls with that strategy)... |
| I'm not sure what you're asking. I can see someone questioned you on the need for a top flight QB already, and you seem to be set on this strategy. However, 2 legitimate RB starters is key, and I'm not sold on Duckett as a legit starter. With Vick back, that offense is going to take on a completely different face. Will he perform like he did at the end of last year? Will he have the touches to do so? Philly's question on scoring is a valid one. My league gives 1 pt / reception (punt, kick or pass). That makes Harrison , who gets 5-7 recs/ game, worth a heck of a lot more. Dante Hall got me 15-25 every week last year. Since I don't see you mentioning a WR at all, am I to assume you have very limited scoring for receivers? I guess if my choice were just between your plans a and b, I'd go with plan A. I'm not sold on Duckett, and don't like giving up CPepp for him. That's solid analysis, no homer-ism! Really!
|
|
Logged |
3 straight underperforming seasons, one nitwit head coach, 2 problem child WRs, 1 collosal trade bungle....but a wild boat party with booze and hookers!!!????? Priceless.
|
|
|
|