Author |
Topic: another can of worms-head to head vs. total points (Read 981 times) |
|
Philosopher King of Fantasy Football Site Administrator GBRFLer Champ - '94, '99, '02, '04
    
 I love ''the Gridiron''!

Posts: 19699
Back to top
|
 |
Re: another can of worms-head to head vs. total po
« Reply #2 on: Jan 22nd, 2003, 1:18am » |
Quote Modify
|
Here's all I got to say regarding this... You wanna' know what the Rock is cookin' up for ya's? Be prepared to put the debates between "total points" and "head-to-head", "keeper" and "turnover" leagues, of "playoffs" versus "no playoffs", "1 starting QB" or "2", over unnecessarily complicated "flex lineups", needlessly difficult "salary caps" and "how many weeks of the season a league should run" behind you. How 'bout the best of these worlds, "head-to-head" and "rotisserie" ??? , combined with these, a "semi-playoff format" ??? , a "10-team, 17-week, 29-game schedule" that will make you forget about even considering playing any fewer ??? , "deep 21-component rosters" and "10-component starting lineups" that really makes depth the key... no relying on that one monster, (an optional) "deep 12 keepers" to test your mettle over the long haul ??? , with liberal trading rules that allow you to trade everything of value within the league, players, draft picks, future draft picks (if applicable) and protection spots ??? ? ... I will eventually get around to explaining ALL of this on Walker_Boh's "Looking for a League" thread. It is just that it is very early in the going and I am VERY strapped for time right now (got some very important personal matters on the plate... good news is I am not leaving this "rock" to return to that other "ROK"). In any case, this, and a whole bunch of other goodies, are all in the works, fellas! You can count on that!
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Philosopher King of Fantasy Football Site Administrator GBRFLer Champ - '94, '99, '02, '04
    
 I love ''the Gridiron''!

Posts: 19699
Back to top
|
 |
Re: another can of worms-head to head vs. total po
« Reply #5 on: Jan 22nd, 2003, 3:49pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 22nd, 2003, 1:51pm, paulinstl wrote:Hey Steg, are you familiar with the term "Occam's Razor"? |
| Yes, as in the "principle of economy" of William of Ockham (also spelled with a "k")! And, if you mean that I want to "cut" through all the bullshit, you're right!
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Head Coach
   
# 4

Posts: 131
Back to top
|
 |
Re: another can of worms-head to head vs. total po
« Reply #7 on: Jan 23rd, 2003, 2:02pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 22nd, 2003, 3:49pm, StegRock wrote: And, if you mean that I want to "cut" through all the bullshit, you're right! |
| I guess that's one way to look at it. Here is what I was alluding to, as it applies to your earlier post about scoring rules in Walker Boh's league thread, Quote:| "when you have two competing theories which make exactly the same predictions, the one that is simpler is the better." |
| I am in no way trying to denegrate the scoring system you will unveil, all I'm trying to say is that with all the possible permutations and changes done to league scoring, it seems to me that the more complicated the system, the more room for errors. Obviously, you have played in this system and really enjoy it, so maybe everything I've said is just dead ass wrong!
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Philosopher King of Fantasy Football Site Administrator GBRFLer Champ - '94, '99, '02, '04
    
 I love ''the Gridiron''!

Posts: 19699
Back to top
|
 |
Re: another can of worms-head to head vs. total po
« Reply #8 on: Jan 23rd, 2003, 6:37pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I gotchya'! My conglomeratic explanation/sales pitch above may look dense, but the overall set-up is very straightforward and simpler than most in many respects. The scoring system is no more or less complicated than the usual, just different, but other league guidelines, regarding trading, free-agent acquisition and such, are much more clear-cut than a lot of what I see out there and have played in. I would say this: the overall set-up, scoring rules and league guidelines, looked at as a whole, is fairer than a lot of what is out there and gives a more accurate reflection of the impact of one players' statistics on a game than most.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
GM
    
# 52
 I love ''the Gridiron''!

Posts: 376
Back to top
|
 |
Re: another can of worms-head to head vs. total po
« Reply #9 on: Jan 24th, 2003, 12:04pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 22nd, 2003, 1:18am, StegRock wrote:Here's all I got to say regarding this... You wanna' know what the Rock is cookin' up for ya's? Be prepared to put the debates between "total points" and "head-to-head", "keeper" and "turnover" leagues, of "playoffs" versus "no playoffs", "1 starting QB" or "2", over unnecessarily complicated "flex lineups", needlessly difficult "salary caps" and "how many weeks of the season a league should run" behind you. How 'bout the best of these worlds, "head-to-head" and "rotisserie" ??? , combined with these, a "semi-playoff format" ??? , a "10-team, 17-week, 29-game schedule" that will make you forget about even considering playing any fewer ??? , "deep 21-component rosters" and "10-component starting lineups" that really makes depth the key... no relying on that one monster, (an optional) "deep 12 keepers" to test your mettle over the long haul ??? , with liberal trading rules that allow you to trade everything of value within the league, players, draft picks, future draft picks (if applicable) and protection spots ??? ? ... I will eventually get around to explaining ALL of this on Walker_Boh's "Looking for a League" thread. It is just that it is very early in the going and I am VERY strapped for time right now (got some very important personal matters on the plate... good news is I am not leaving this "rock" to return to that other "ROK"). In any case, this, and a whole bunch of other goodies, are all in the works, fellas! You can count on that! |
| Oh. the suspense, pain,agony how about a hint or 2.
|
|
Logged |
I was framed, I never do nothin wrong but every time I get the blame, I was framed!!!!!
|
|
|
|